With George Noory
Live Nightly 1am - 5am EST / 10pm - 2am PST
A "NEAT" Controversy - Articles

Coast Insider

Not a member? Become a Coast Insider to stream or download new and past shows!

Coast Insider

Not a member? Become a Coast Insider to stream or download new and past shows!

Last Show Recap

In a special three-part report, Earthfiles investigative reporter Linda Moulton Howe shared her conversations with Canadian UFO investigator and author Grant Cameron about the ongoing October 2016 WikiLeaks' dump of hacked John Podesta's emails.

First hour guest, paranormal investigator Rich Newman talked about his research of over 300 bridges in America which harbor hauntings and eerie phenomena.

Upcoming Shows

Fri 10-28  Demonic Hauntings Sat 10-29  Extreme Hauntings Special Sun 10-30  UFOs & the Occult/ Scents & the Paranormal Mon 10-31  Ghost to Ghost 2016 Tue 11-01  Power Grid Vulnerability/ Dreams & Music Wed 11-02  NWO & Conspiracies/ Open Lines Thu 11-03  Tales of an Exorcist/ Bizarre Fiction Fri 11-04  Afterlife Adventures/ Open Lines


Sign up for our free CoastZone e-newsletter to receive exclusive daily articles.

A "NEAT" Controversy


Tonight's guest Daniel Durda has studied smaller objects moving in our solar system such as asteroids and comets. Recently there was an eruption of controversy surrounding the comet NEAT(1), with accusations spreading via the Internet that NASA was covering up information about its trajectory. According to an article(2) on Space.com, web-based rumors widely circulated that the comet was planet-sized and could radically alter Earth's weather.

In fact the comet, which was observed receiving a coronal mass ejection(3) as it approached the sun, is only a few miles wide according to scientists. It currently is heading back to the outer solar system and away from Earth. Yet, a report that recently surfaced associated with the Rand Corp. added to the controversy. It was suggested that if the Earth was about to be hit by a large asteroid, authorities might not inform the public in order to avoid mass panic, when nothing really could be done to prevent it. Later it came out that the information was from a graduate student at the Rand School who said his quotes were misconstrued.

Meanwhile, one might wonder, how does Nancy Lieder, the guru-ess of Planet X weigh in on NEAT which was said to occupy roughly the same space as her predicted body? "Comets are hardly likely to be mistaken for the Planet X complex, which will be red, primarily, and so much larger than comet bodies...," she wrote in a ZetaTalk session dated Feb. 22, 2003. She goes on further to state that when the X complex does become visible in the sky, it will be misidentified by NASA and their "lackeys" as an "asteroid bunch, passing comet, unusual comet, Mars closest pass in many eons, or whatever."


1. http://cometography.com/lcomets/2002v1.html
2. http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/comet_conspiracy_030228.html
3. http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/hotshots/