Guest host Rich Berra (email) welcomed retired Army lieutenant colonel Kevin Randle, who explored a range of ideas about time travel, combining theoretical physics with science fiction concepts. He acknowledged that time travel into the future is theoretically possible through relativistic speeds, as suggested by Einstein's theories, but he was skeptical about the feasibility of traveling into the past. Randle discussed the common time travel paradoxes, like the grandfather paradox and causality loops, referencing stories such as Somewhere in Time and Stephen King's 11/22/63 to highlight the narrative challenges and philosophical implications. He emphasized the ripple effect of even minor changes in the past, referencing the "butterfly effect" and how such changes can lead to unforeseen consequences, as seen in various science fiction works.
Randle drew heavily from his experience as a science fiction author, mentioning his novels like Remember the Alamo and On the Second Tuesday of Next Week. These stories involve characters trying to fix historical outcomes, only to find their interventions make things worse. He reflected on the challenge of maintaining internal consistency in time travel narratives, noting how difficult it is to avoid paradoxes and contradictions. He praised well-constructed time travel stories such as Back to the Future, The Final Countdown, and the Stargate SG-1 episode involving time loops, but he also pointed out flaws and inconsistencies in some portrayals, particularly when the consequences of time travel are ignored or minimized.
Randle also addressed popular theories and media portrayals, including the idea that time might not be linear and how some believe historical events could be observed with advanced technology. He touched on fringe claims, like the Vatican's alleged possession of a device to view the past, and debunked wartime myths about Nazi time travel research. Throughout the conversation, Randle maintained a balanced view, recognizing time travel's enduring appeal in fiction while expressing skepticism about its practicality in reality.
------------------------------------------
In the second half, exorcist Bill Bean shared a deeply personal and intense perspective on the influence of dark spiritual forces within popular culture. Drawing from his own traumatic experiences with demonic attacks during childhood, Bean emphasized that evil operates through an organized, earthly "brotherhood" directed by demonic entities. He believes that figures in the entertainment industry, including artists like Ozzy Osbourne and Youngblood, engage in ritualistic practices that mirror ancient satanic symbolism. According to Bean, these acts are not merely theatrical but are part of deliberate spiritual exchanges or invocations, reinforcing the presence of an Illuminati-like group that wields power through entertainment, media, and manipulation of mass consciousness.
Bean elaborated on how the devil works through legal rights and open doorways, warning that even devout individuals, including clergy, can come under demonic attack when spiritual vulnerabilities are exploited. He recounted firsthand experiences of helping pastors and church communities overcome such forces, asserting that curses and generational hexes are real and can be deadly. He disagreed with the idea that strong faith alone is always enough to prevent such attacks, stating that even faithful people can fall prey when exposed to spiritual warfare, especially if pride, unresolved conflict, or hidden sin opens a door.
Bean connected the rise of demonic influence to a long-term strategy that began in the mid-20th century, especially through the rise of rebellious music, media programming, and psychological operations post-World War II. He argued that cultural figures have played a role in this descent—intentionally or not—by spreading messages that erode the family unit, encourage moral decay, and inspire rebellion. Bean denounced the New Age belief in self-deification as spiritually dangerous, asserting that elevating oneself as a god invites divine wrath and demonic infiltration. He credited God for his discernment and protection, stressing that he is merely a vessel doing God's work to battle a growing darkness he believes is consuming modern society.