Investigator Ashton Forbes joined guest host Rich Berra (email) to reveal that the disappearance of Malaysian Flight 370 (MH370) was not a simple aviation mystery but a cover-up of a high-tech operation involving U.S. military capabilities. Forbes suggested the plane experienced a lithium-ion battery fire, which would have caused incapacitating smoke while allowing the aircraft to continue flying for over an hour. He emphasized that Malaysian officials lied about radar data, and theorized the fire may have served as cover for a more sophisticated operation targeting key passengers—namely 20 employees from Freescale Semiconductor with ties to U.S. defense technology—who may have been defecting or carrying sensitive knowledge.
He pointed to videos from 2014 that purportedly show MH370 surrounded by three plasma orbs that ultimately "teleport" the plane. According to Forbes, these videos are genuine military surveillance footage, not CGI, and the orbs represent advanced U.S.-developed autonomous drone weapons, not extraterrestrial craft. He identified the source of the videos as a Navy officer allegedly punished under suspicious national security charges. Forbes argued that this incident exposed the existence of a secret U.S. breakaway technological civilization decades ahead of public science, operating with quantum-level weapons capable of teleportation and possibly tied to zero-point energy or cold fusion.
Forbes said the U.S. government not only possesses this secret technology but actively suppresses and manipulates public perception through media and staged disclosure efforts. Officials like Obama, Clapper, and Haines were directly involved in managing the MH370 cover-up, evidenced by delayed responses and heavy intelligence involvement, he continued. Forbes suggested the military-industrial complex uses public UFO interest to mask real technological breakthroughs. This incident could be the key to understanding the true nature of the UAP phenomenon—not alien visitation, but clandestine human-developed tech far beyond what is publicly acknowledged, he noted.
------------------------------------------
In the latter half of the program, Robert K. Tanenbaum, a former homicide prosecutor and Deputy Chief Counsel for the House Select Committee on Assassinations, discussed his firsthand experience investigating the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Initially skeptical and uninvolved in conspiracy theories, Tanenbaum’s views shifted after encountering evidence and serious obstruction from the CIA. He emphasized that his investigation, initiated by Chief Counsel Richard Sprague, was only undertaken after assurances from Congress that it would be free from political interference. However, within four months, those assurances unraveled, and Tanenbaum and Sprague concluded that their findings were being actively suppressed. According to Tanenbaum, the CIA not only obstructed the investigation but may have participated in the assassination.
Tanenbaum pointed to the eyewitness testimony from Dealey Plaza and the scientific evidence in the Zapruder film to refute the official narrative of a lone gunman. He cited the sequence and timing of the gunshots, especially the two flurries of fire within 8.3 seconds, as being inconsistent with the mechanical limitations of Oswald's alleged rifle. He highlighted the physical reactions of JFK's body—specifically the backward and then forward motion of his head—as incompatible with the government's theory that all shots came from behind. Tanenbaum noted the absurdity of the CIA's efforts to replicate the headshot scenario using gelatinized skulls—all of which responded in a way that contradicted the official account.
Tanenbaum condemned using neutron activation analysis (NAA), once used by the FBI to validate bullet fragment matching, as discredited science. He recounted that after metallurgical experts denounced NAA's reliability, the U.S. government shut down its only lab conducting those tests in 2005. Yet, the flawed science had already been used to uphold the single-bullet theory and the case against Oswald. Tanenbaum alleged that the CIA, threatened by Kennedy’s intention to restructure intelligence operations under his brother Robert, chose to eliminate the president rather than relinquish power. In his view, the Kennedy assassination was not just a murder, but an institutional betrayal covered by decades of deception and flawed forensics.